/
Campaign - Admin - Pacing Delivery

Campaign - Admin - Pacing Delivery

Overview:


Quantitative Data:

Data driven justification for ux/ui changes, especially necessary for organic changes that do not originate from client requests or roadmap features.

Link

Date Range

Item

Metric & Value

Assumption

Link

Date Range

Item

Metric & Value

Assumption

 

00/00/2021
to
00/00/2021
(0 Days)

 

Metric name

  • Metric Value

HYPOTHESES

  • Lorum ipsum

REASONING

  • Lorum ipsum


Competitor Research:

Function

Findings

Image

Takeaways

Function

Findings

Image

Takeaways

 

 

 

Embrace

Reject

TO DISCUSS


Proposal Feedback:

Stakeholder

Date

Changes

Stakeholder

Date

Changes

Product

04/04/23

Done

  • Create a ‘minimum requirement’ flow (campaign > publisher > pacing)

    • Existing flow caters for the more complex scenario where pacing can be setup on a publisher and band level with each month being fully customisable.

    • Create a new flow that caters for a simpler scenario where pacing is setill setup on a publisher and band level, but each months requirement is the same.

  • Add a ‘totals’ row

    • On each ‘cap requirement' table (campaign > publisher > pacing), add a ‘totals’ row to help the user see how much of their allocation as been assigned to each month

    • On each ‘fulfilment breakdown’ table (publisher > view > pacing), add a ‘totals’ row to help the user see how much of their allocation as been fulfilled each month

Rejected

need more info

TO DISCUSS

  • Add an ‘autofill/autobalance’ button (campaign > publisher > pacing)

    • Need to scope this to determine how it could work

      • Autofill based on calculation of total leads required split evenly between all months per band depending on number of days remaining

      • Autofill based on a manually input number from user, therefore cutting out most of the potentially repetative number inputting

        • E.g. if campaign duration is 12 months, 10 of those months will have cap of 100, therefore if cap of 100 is autofilled on all inputs, only 2 have to be changed to the unique cap

  • Weekly cadence

    • Require mocks for this yet or waiting on more customer feedback?

  • Dedicated page

    • If we have full customisation on months and publishers and bands, maybe a dedicated page would work better? Could live under campaign > admin?

TO DO

Product

14/04/23

Done

  • Rethink previously created mocks by creating a mvp mock with autocalculation and autobalancing

    • Overall idea is for customers to have the least amount of input as possible (the more input, maybe the less likely they are to use the product)

      • Therefore, have a dialog which has a single toggle to turn the feature on and off, no other inputs required

      • Table to display breakdown for each publisher on a weekly basis

      • If campaign settings change (campaign dates, volumes, publisher allocations, adding new publisher), auto balancing occurs without any user input

    • Present this to customers and gauge if this would work for their scenarios, e.g. customers might say:

      • I need to be able to pace monthly

      • I need to be able to manually input because it changes from week to week or month to month, so even distribution doesn’t work

    • Then take this feedback and build on the current mocks if required based on customer feedback

Rejected

need more info

TO DISCUSS

TO DO

Product & CS

14/06/23

Done

Setup

  • On the pacing dialog in the blue help bar, explain that publisher who are using bands will be delivered on a first come first serve basis

  • On the pacing dialog, have indicator of how much of the requirements have been input (e.g. X / 120 leads required)

Breakdown

  • On the pacing dialog, show amount of leads delivered for past weeks

Rejected

need more info

TO DISCUSS

TO DO

Product & Dev

21/06/23

Done

Setup

  • New column/indicator to show how many leads have been deemed ‘billable’ for each delivery period

  • As the weeks progress, previous delivery periods become uneditable and the allocation indicator will be updated if previous delivery requirements are not met

Rejected

need more info

TO DISCUSS

TO DO

Product & Dev

29/06/23

Done

Setup

  • Move to dedicated page under campaign > ‘admin’ dropdown rather than dialog

Breakdown

  • Remove ‘weekly pacing’ column as the button breakdown is enough for mvp

Rejected

need more info

TO DISCUSS

TO DO

Product & DSG

29/06/23

Done

Setup

  • Added a screen to show validation when a user inputs a value that is over the total allocation requirement

  • Added a confirmation dialog to ask the user if they’re sure they want to save the configuration even if the configuration will not meet the total allocation requirement for X publisher.

Rejected

need more info

TO DISCUSS

TO DO

 


Retrospective:

To be completed after this features release. The retrospective should allow a basis for further improvements to this feature.

User Feedback

Stakeholder

Date

Description

Stakeholder

Date

Description

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quantitative Data

Link

Date Range

Item

Metric & Value

Assumption

Link

Date Range

Item

Metric & Value

Assumption

 

00/00/2021
to
00/00/2021
(0 Days)

 

Metric name

  • Metric Value

HYPOTHESES

  • Lorum ipsum

REASONING

  • Lorum ipsum